Jan 31, 2009

Nice!



Glad to see we are getting the ball rolling on this! I should have everyone who sent me an email address good to go by the end of tonight. Also, I think I'm the only one that can change the actual style of the page, so again, if you have suggestions on colors or formatting, etc., let me know so I can get to it.

Happy posting!

Internet Image of the Week

Truly, a master work of the greatest philosopher of our age.

Just a reminder


So just a quick reminder to everyone that i have another blog about my over all trip but over the next two or three days i'm gonna be writing extensively about my big trip up north last week. It should be pretty good so if anyone is interested at all or wants to read more about the rest of my trip over here so far the blog is http://milkman30.livejournal.com/.

I also just wanted to try this blog out, i think this might work actually. Again lets give it some time before we decide to pick up lock stock from the wall, but this is pretty good.

All-Star Snubs and Duds



The NBA released the starters and reserves for the All-Star game that will take place in Phoenix, and while the some of the choices are no surprise (O'Neal, Duncan, Kobe, LeBron, Garnett....), I think there are a few players who perhaps should've been considered. Also, I don't agree with everyone on that list, but the fans or coaches voted them in.

WEST ALL-STARS
Starters
I basically think everyone on this should be there except Amar'e "STAT" Stoudemire. I'm not saying he's bad by any means, but he just doesn't seem to fit the same profile he usually performs as. Yeah, his numbers are down. Big deal. So are Big Ticket's. My problem is his attitude this season just seems to be worse than his typically arrogant self. He just doesn't scream "All-Star" as loudly as those he's starting with. For instance, Yao Ming is pretty much single-handedly keeping Houston afloat while T-Mac and Ron Ron are out. Amar'e? I don't know. I just can't give it to him so readily. Reserve for sure but not starter. Everyone else I'm cool with.

Reserves/Snubs
Again, most of these I agree with (especially B-Roy!!! YEAH! Finally made it!), but there are a couple of guys I'd rather see.

Tony Parker. What else can you say about the guy except he's an amazing PG-slasher, Finals MVP, and NBA champion? I think that about covers it. That's my problem with him. He's just... that... A winner but not exciting. Mr. Fundamental isn't exactly jaw-dropping either, but one really can't deny his greatness. (It's almost blasphemous not to see TD playing.) Still, I'd drop Tony Parker and add his teammate GINOBLI! *Charles Barkley style* Waaaaay more exciting and just as crucial (if not more) to his team. And who doesn't want to hear Barkley yell his name? I know this is just a personal preference for Ginobli. I'm doggin' Parker. He definitely is All-Sar caliber, but I'd rather see his teammate.

David West. I can see why the coaches voted him in. He really is a great asset to a team, but how do you snub Melo? I know the haters have found him to be selfish and egotistical (Amar'e?), but Melo's style has shifted with the arrival of Mr. Big Shot-- in a great way. The new Carmelo Anthony is doing what his team needs from him. Plus, he's one of the greatest offensive players in the league! I think it's a shame not to have someone of his talent level not playing in the All-Star game. West: I'm sorry, but I just can't agree here.

Al Jefferson. Damn, can this guy play! Why is he not included? Limited spots, I know. But still. Throw this guy a bone because not many players play at or above his level.

Other than that, I can't really complain about the West All-Star roster. Sure, there are some players I'd like to see play-- Kevin Durant, Baron Davis, T-Mac, Carlos Boozer, Deron Williams, and Kevin Martin-- but I mainly just want to see them on the big stage. I don't think they're better, but it would be cool nonetheless. Multiple All-Star games, anyone?

EAST ALL-STARS
Starters
Everyone here is good, but I have a slight beef with A.I. as a starting guard versus someone like Rajon Rondo (snubbed), Jameer Nelson (a reserve), Jose Calderon (snubbed), Mo Williams (snub) or Joe Johnson (reserve). A.I. is awesome in the All-Star games, but I still would rather see some new blood in the starting lineup.

Reserves/Snubs
Looks good (even though I absolutely despise Paul Pierce!), but I'm very disappointed there is no love for Rondo, Calderon, Duhon, Williams, Andrew Bogut, or David Lee.

Rajon Rondo keeps the Celtics moving. I honestly don't think they would be near the caliber they actually are if it weren't for him. A travesty not having him play. He's a budding superstar. I bet money he becomes an All-Star next year.

Jose Calderon is essential to Toronto (look at their record when he's unable to play), and he plays like an elite PG. So, what's the deal, coaches? Nothing? The guy is an assist machine, shoots extremely well, and runs a team like a PG should. What more can the guy do?

Chris Duhon. I know he's probably the most controversial, but he does keep the Knicks moving. He puts up great numbers (except his FG%), and for awhile, he handled a ton of minutes that would have most players gasping for breath. He's got a heavy responsibility, and I don't think some PG's would make it. You decide.

Mo Williams is a large reason the Cavs are in the position they are-- bumping up with the absolute elite teams in the league. Huge baskets from this kid every night, and LeBron can finally relax a little bit. If he isn't playing at an All-Star level, I just don't know anymore.

The Aussie is a beast. Andrew Bogut definitely deserves a shout for All-Star recognition. He's consistent, shoots well, rebounds, and defends (not amazingly, but good). All the things a center should do. What gives? There aren't many players that are putting up better numbers than him. Can you name them? Yeah, they're All-Stars. And their numbers aren't that much better.

David Lee: (see above reasoning for Andrew Bogut)

The East All-Stars has me a little more perturbed than the West. On one hand you have shoe ins like LeBron and Wade, and then on the other hand you have first-timers who (while playing really, really well) should be reconsidered.

Side note: I hate-- I mean I HATE-- that announcers, commentators, and reporters are bringing up team records when discussing All-Stars. This is NOT the MVP voting!! Everyone knows the All-Star game is all about bringing the best individual players together-- regardless of what their team is actually doing. Ugh. It just rubs me the wrong way.

Jan 30, 2009

Review: Operation: Anchorage?

So, the first of three Fallout 3 DLC arrived, and I've already finished it. Yeah, already. I knew it was going to be short, but I'm pretty sure I beat the new content in just under three hours. Besides that, I found it quite enjoyable. Not much to say story wise, but the new items are definitely pretty handy. Although, the presentation of Anchorage is less than stellar. Here's the breakdown:


Good

New Items: There are definitely some great things to be looted in Operation: Anchorage. The Gauss Rifle in particular is pretty sweet (although, you can't repair it once it breaks down *sigh*). Finally, something besides the Sniper Rifle and Scoped .44 Magnum to work with when sniping Super Mutants. Also, the two armors available are quite good as well. One is just a repeat of another (possible to get in You Gotta Shoot 'em in the Head, I believe), but the ninja-like Chinese armor is great if your character relies on stealth. It doesn't hurt that it looks awesome too!

Action!: Now, I love the pacing of Fallout 3, but sometimes I just want to mow people down. The new levels deliver just that. From semi-squad based action to trench warfare, Operation: Anchorage brings something a little different to the table. Is it the best FPS I've ever played? Not even close. But I'm glad the pacing shifted a little bit if only for a few hours. Besides, killing tons of Chinese communists is just plain fun!

Bad
That's it?: I wasn't expecting the grand 16 square miles or the crazy fetch quests the main game supplies but three hours? What more is there to say? You download it. Play for a little while. It's over. Disappointing on that front. More so, there is very little reason to replay it.

Anchorage looks like... not this:
So, I'm from Anchorage. Born and raised. I'm a little pissed off that Anchorage didn't look anything like it's real-life counterpart. I'm talking nothing looked like it should. Perhaps, I'm the only one who cares because that's my hometown, but I was pretty excited to explore even just a little bit of where I come from. I guess, I won't get to. I'll give Bethesda Studios some credit for having some name drops (Fire Island, Chugach, etc.), but it would seem that's all the effort they were going to put in.

Overall
For what it's worth, Operation: Anchorage is a pretty fun distraction from the beast that is Fallout 3. If you got an extra $10, I say go for it. If you didn't really care for Fallout 3 the first time through, don't bother at all. Oh, and if you're from Anchorage, just be prepared to see your "hometown" represented poorly.